I see AI-native ad production as a way to make advertising creative and services more accessible to businesses, potentially at a fraction of traditional UGC agency costs. My posts describe the opportunity and offers, but do not provide campaign performance evidence, package prices, or enough detail to assess the savings.
On December 8, 2025, I said my team had made the creative being shown and described AI as “getting scary good” and our system at Akemi as “amazing.” I offered monthly ad packages for a fraction of the cost of UGC agencies and invited people to DM me. I gave no prices, deliverables, or performance results.
In a separate reply on December 8, 2025, I addressed @rungoogleads and said the examples were unedited, showing what the models could look like and act like. I offered to send examples and said I could get some free ones for their productions; the post does not clarify exactly what “models” or “ones” referred to.
On May 27, 2026, I claimed that the best-performing Meta ads in 2026 were made by 19-year-olds in their bedrooms using CapCut and an AI voice. I said agencies charging $15K retainers should be nervous. I offered no examples or performance data to support the claim.
On August 14, 2026, I described e-commerce as intense and predicted that top-rank, AI-enabled performance marketers were emerging from its trenches, adding that Silicon Valley VCs and tech investors were not ready for what was coming. In the quoted post, @FedotOff90—not me—said the Lymphoria team used Gethookd and claimed its founder was 17 and making “8+ fig per month.” Those claims, and the account of meeting and describing the founder, were @FedotOff90’s and were not independently verified in my post.
Related: big brands adopting ai ads, ai automation in media buying, one winning ad changes everything