On June 24, 2026 at 13:42 UTC, I reacted to a linked ad with “Holy winning ad.” The captured post does not identify what the ad showed or provide evidence of its performance, so this records my reaction rather than a verified result: https://t.co/Jiz4LaG9hH.
On October 2, 2026 at 12:10 UTC, I called a linked ad “Simple but genius” and observed, “There’s a lot of money in solving small everyday annoyances.” The capture does not identify the ad, product, or evidence behind that general observation: https://t.co/b1lcavJZrs.
On October 27, 2025, I joked that Temu was taking the whole Andromeda creative-diversity thing seriously: “Temu is really taking the whole Andromeda creative diversity thing seriously. 🤣” I did not explain what Temu had done, what Andromeda creative diversity means, or what the link contained: https://t.co/0Fwp24e4Vf.
On November 14, 2025, I argued that if everyone hates ads, making ads people do not hate solves a huge problem. I did not describe how to make ads less annoying or how to measure whether people dislike them.
On December 13, 2025, I said that the people or organization behind a linked example had really good ads: “These guys have really good ads man.” I did not identify them or describe the ads: https://t.co/ZaJQ1h4jSf.
On January 3, 2026, I called @draprints’s post about Colgate teeth whitening strips “great promotion.” @draprints said that after using the strips for 2 weeks, people asked whether they had gotten veneers, and compared the strips’ $40 cost with $2000 for professional whitening. Those are @draprints’s reported experience and price comparison, not results I independently verified; the post does not specify the currency, product variant, or details of the professional whitening.
On April 8, 2025, I called an ad for a magnetic nose strip “really cool.” I did not identify its creator or platform, and the capture does not specify the dates covered by its view count. The ad is linked at https://t.co/hFWzUXNHUD.
The magnetic nose strip ad had a reported 13.5M views in the last 30 days.
A link-only capture dated May 1, 2025 at 14:15 UTC contains https://t.co/IYj2kUzGO4, but no post text or information about what the link contains.
On May 20, 2025, I called an unidentified static ad “genius.” I praised its format, clear value proposition, and scroll-stopping image as a good recipe for success. Those observations align with my notes on clear headlines win statics and repeatable static formats worth testing. I shared https://t.co/G1KGRVN8i0; the capture does not identify the creator or what the ad advertised.
The static ad was reported to have 113K likes; the post does not say when that count was recorded.
On June 21, 2025, I described linked material as “really good content.” The capture does not identify what the content was or who authored it; I shared https://t.co/A9oY9B30S0.
I notice advertising examples that make a product’s appeal immediately engaging, whether through a compelling video or a clear presentation of results. These are examples I found worth noting, not campaigns I created or tested.
On January 14, 2025, I wrote, “As a creative your ideas are your strongest form of currency.” I included https://t.co/sckTjsOS4a, but the captured post does not reveal what the link contains.
On January 21, 2025, I shared an ad with my Discord community, calling it “Simple but genius” and praising its “great social proof.” I said “K-beauty is on another level.” The post reported 5.4M views and 325K likes and linked to https://t.co/msV4xuk8un; it did not identify the ad or its creator.
On February 21, 2025, I commented that an ad might seem too over the top, but that it was being run by a billion-dollar company and had 266,000 likes. I called the engagement wild and attributed the ad’s ability to attract attention to relatability: “The relatability is clearly hitting a pain point and stopping the scroll.” The company and ad are unidentified in the captured post, which links to https://t.co/fhIjTeOXHN.
On March 7, 2025, I called a static ad on Meta “Simple but genius” and said its template could easily be used for a product. I reported that it got 254K likes and called that “a lot of social proof.” The captured post does not identify the ad or say whether I tested the template; it links to https://t.co/1DVkGmVkWD.
On 2024-11-10, I called a K-beauty video I saw on my burner account “brilliant” and said it “would kill it as an ad.” It had 32.9M views and 2.9M likes in 2 days. The link I noted was https://t.co/rJyADJutx5; the captured content does not identify the creator or product.
I have two link-only X captures from 2024-12-01: https://t.co/nGvq4laJ0y at 18:18 UTC and https://t.co/hEGDsMfUPF at 21:26 UTC. Neither capture includes post text or explains what its link contains.
On 2025-01-08, I praised a before-and-after presentation as a cool way to show what a product can deliver. I thought people were especially interested in seeing product results, making this approach stand out and grab attention. The example is linked at https://t.co/R01wq9uN6Z, but the captured post does not identify the product.
Related: static ads worth studying, ad creative angles that convert, finding and borrowing winning ideas