I have shared brief reactions to Gemini and Google, and expressed anticipation about Gemini 3.0. These posts give little detail about the products or developments behind my reactions, but they reflect my interest in Google’s place in the wider AI competition described in the ai wars heat up.
On July 12, 2025 at 03:16 UTC, I wrote, “I'm liking Gemini rn” and shared https://t.co/cRh0Ovj7oM. I did not say which Gemini product or version I meant, or what the link contained.
On September 25, 2025 at 20:38 UTC, my post began with “what” and quoted @DeItaone, who attributed to The Information a report that Meta was in talks to use Google Gemini for ad targeting. This was @DeItaone’s reported claim, not one I independently verified; my post gave no further details about the talks or their outcome.
On November 14, 2025 at 21:17 UTC, I wrote, “Good call. Can’t wait to see what we can do with Gemini 3.0”. I did not specify what “good call” referred to, who “we” meant, or what work I anticipated doing with Gemini 3.0.
On July 18, 2026 at 14:25 UTC, I wrote, “Gemini is slept on.” I did not specify which aspect of Gemini I considered underrated, and shared https://t.co/Og3bchYz49 without describing its contents.
On December 5, 2025 at 23:16 UTC, I wrote, “Google is tripping me out.” and shared https://t.co/qtDiLOcriP. I did not explain what prompted my reaction or what the link contained.
Related: the ai wars heat up, ai funding mania, anthropic s meteoric rise