On April 15, 2025, I noted that Chinese suppliers were going viral by exposing the cost of goods of popular brands. I shared https://t.co/jd1rmLEGOH, but did not name suppliers or brands, give specific costs, or explain how the disclosures were verified.
On August 28, 2025, I reacted “Dude.” to a quoted post from @deedydas, who claimed that ByteDance had made more money than Meta for the first time in history. That was @deedydas’s claim, not one I independently asserted or verified; the captured post gives no revenue figures or comparison details.
On August 29, 2025, I observed that ByteDance had gone from zero to passing Meta in less than a decade, and described that pace as indicative of consumer attention today. The post gives no revenue figures or supporting details for the comparison.
On November 14, 2025, I agreed with a post by @levelsio about American perceptions of China. In my own words, I said China was making bigger moves than most people in America think and that propaganda blinds them. I added that China has “literally 3-4x the people,” which I said helps explain why it is getting so much done so fast. I did not specify the populations or measurements behind that comparison, identify particular developments, or provide evidence for these views.
On November 25, 2025, I called China “so cracked” and said I couldn’t wait to visit. I shared https://t.co/X0CxNwwBCu, but the post did not explain what prompted my reaction or give any details about a planned visit.
On December 25, 2025, I reacted “China is seriously cooking” to a post by @TansuYegen. Their quoted post said students aged 9–12 in China had made a two-stage rocket powered by water pressure from plastic bottles, together with their teachers. The quote included a link, but the capture gives no further project details or results; those claims belong to @TansuYegen’s post, not to an independent report from me.
On July 21, 2026, I shared the headline “Aliexpress Just Got Hit With A $627 Million Fine” and linked https://t.co/NU7nh8dt1o. The captured post does not identify who imposed the fine, explain its basis, or include the linked article, so I cannot verify or add context to the headline’s claim from this capture alone.
The AliExpress headline I shared claimed a $627 million fine, but the capture does not identify who imposed it or explain its basis.
Related: china s battery and energy revolution, us china rivalry and diplomacy, china s futuristic products and infrastructure