On November 13, 2025, I said to add Canva to the mix for branded static ads and product images, and remarked, “Insane what you can do these days.” I did not explain how I use Canva or what else is in the mix. I also quoted @ariesnotebook describing Claude plus nano banana as an “absolutely cracked combination”; that characterization was theirs, not mine.
On November 13, 2025, I said I mainly use Claude for copy and prompt ideas. I did not specify what kinds of copy or prompts I mean, or whether I use Claude for other tasks.
On November 13, 2025, in a reply to @ecompixsil, I said the current option “feels nerfed” and suggested going straight to nano banana instead, or waiting for the item at https://t.co/UH6mo27dVO. The reply does not identify what felt nerfed, what nano banana refers to, or what the linked item is.
On November 13, 2025, I said I was making prelanders with an unspecified tool or thing, using a Claude prompt, and called the result “pretty fire.” The capture does not identify what “it” refers to, what the prelanders were for, or what the prompt did.
On November 14, 2025, I said I got a good prelander done in minutes by asking Claude for the prompt I needed to generate it in one shot. I changed the images and made minor polishes afterward, and said it was “looking icy.” @ariesnotebook—not me—wrote, “Ecom is getting so icy man.”
I see AI tools as useful across creative production and ad research: I have praised ChatGPT for iterative product images, described analyzing video ads with Gemini, and called Claude plus nano banana an “absolutely cracked combination.”
On May 19, 2025, I said ChatGPT is great for product images when I iterate a lot. I contrasted that process with hiring a designer, which I said would be costly and time-consuming, and called the technology unbelievable.
On June 28, 2025, replying to @jsolmps, I wrote, “Give you a customer avatar based on the ad + new scripts.” The captured reply does not clarify which ad or scripts I meant, or whether this was an offer or an instruction; it does not include @jsolmps’s original post.
On June 28, 2025, I said Gemini can analyze video ads, then be prompted to provide an ideal avatar, pain points, and desires. @jsolmps asked how uploading ad videos to Gemini would help; that question was theirs, and my post does not report measured results.
On November 13, 2025, I described Claude plus nano banana as an “absolutely cracked combination.” I did not specify what nano banana refers to, what task I use the combination for, or what makes it effective.
Related: high performing ai ad examples, arcads ai ugc ads, big brands adopting ai ads