Musk has gone too far
At 2026‑10‑11 07:56 UTC I replied to @elonmusk with "@elonmusk i'd rather be in Ambani's army than yours".
At 2026‑10‑11 07:56 UTC I replied to @elonmusk with "@elonmusk i'd rather be in Ambani's army than yours".
I noted I won't call Musk failed yet because that will only be if his lasting reputation is defined by bullying rather than invention.
At 2026‑10‑09 18:55 UTC I replied to @elonmusk (and @bscholl) with a terse refusal “No”.
I replied to @elonmusk on 2026‑10‑09 10:48 UTC with a terse, confrontational message. Quote: Replying to @elonmusk: @elonmusk @Starlink f you
I replied to @elonmusk with “@elonmusk naahi pahije re baba” on 2026-10-08 01:53 UTC.
On 2026‑10‑09 05:49 UTC I posted a strong criticism of Indian politician Rahul Gandhi, warning that any alignment with him could delay Elon Musk’s Starlink license in India and urging Indian founders to focus on spacetech rather than political entanglements.
Hundreds of millions of young should now question neutrality on twitter and everything else he claims to be doing ‘for the good’.
The reply is a brief Marathi statement expressing a negative sentiment (“don’t want it”) with informal familiarity, useful for sentiment‑analysis of spontaneous social media interactions.