Comparing processes: At NASA, a design change required 3 meetings, 2 committees, a review board, and 6 to 18 months of documentation. At SpaceX, his new supervisor said "if it works, build it. If it doesn't, change it by Friday." The primary difference is the time between a thought and a test, leading to an order‑of‑magnitude higher output per engineer.
At NASA, a design change required 3 meetings, 2 committees, a review board, and 6 to 18 months of documentation.
I noted a shipping‑to‑writing ratio of 10:1, meaning for every unit of writing effort we ship ten units of product.
I believe that getting things done creates network – action builds connections, not just talking about them.
I avoid being “the guy who knows everyone but cannot get anything done.”
I suggested to @Nornor_247 and @crshmarket that we can keep talking or we can keep building on 2026‑08‑18 03:36 UTC.
I champion the mantra “Make > Consume” as a guiding principle for projects, aiming to build rather than merely consume.
Vision: Build to propel 🇮🇳 to an age of abundance.
I quote @protosphinx: “Building is mandatory. Breathing is optional.” to underscore urgency.