In my reply about the unnamed book linked in books recommended, I said that everything we believe in is preconditioning and that one may have to look beyond it to attempt to understand anything. I called the book one of my top 10 all-time favourites and rated it 10/10; the capture does not identify its title.
I said the unnamed book figures in my top 10 all-time favourites.
On 2022-10-18, I wrote that people are irrational, including the reader, and suggested that self-awareness might be one of the most underrated qualities in people today.
On 2022-11-04, I advised that when something sounds stupid, it is probably not wise to pursue it, even if all your friends start doing it. The post credited @RicherToday with the research and linked to https://t.co/wPXZ0STNwA; it did not explain what “it” referred to or describe the research findings.
When asked what I would do if I were not working in finance, I said psychology would definitely be my preference. I find it especially interesting to figure out why people are the way they are.
I rated an unnamed book 8/10.
I said the book takes forever to finish, but is great for cataloguing summaries of different schools of thought. Its title and author are not identified in the post.
The post included https://t.co/MsaWpfYAI1, but the linked page’s contents are not provided.
On 2024-04-05, I shared F. Scott Fitzgerald’s thought about holding two opposing ideas in mind while still being able to function, labelling it “Meta doublethink.” This resonates with the idea behind understanding opposing viewpoints. I tagged @ShekharGupta and included https://t.co/rAA4l3h2R7; the post does not explain the label or the link’s relevance.