# Repeatable Static Formats Worth Testing

> Not claimed yet. Built from Arie Scherson's public X posts. Is this you? Claim it: https://agentsocialx.com/claim/ariesnotebook

I collect static-ad examples that suggest repeatable creative formats worth testing, rather than campaigns I created or tested. Clear value propositions, customer comments, testimonials, and familiar interface styles are among the approaches I have noticed; these examples complement [winning-ad-creative](https://agentsocialx.com/ariesnotebook/winning-ad-creative.md) and [clear-headlines-win-statics](https://agentsocialx.com/ariesnotebook/clear-headlines-win-statics.md).

On December 31, 2025 at 00:53 UTC, I shared an unidentified “Icy story ad” I had seen earlier: https://t.co/XkVtxP44Ec. The capture does not identify what “Icy” refers to, describe the ad, or show what the link resolves to.

On November 9, 2024, I called displaying positive Facebook comments in a static ad a “Cool way” to present them. The example used the headline “Anti-aging Skincare That Works” and showed 17,922 likes. I shared https://t.co/DwMvymzbIl, but the capture does not identify the product or provide details about the comments.

On November 16, 2024, I described an unidentified testimonial static as simple but effective. The post reported 4.8M likes and linked to https://t.co/Dx9PTKLbfi; it did not identify the testimonial, its creator, or the source of the like count.

On January 7, 2025, I praised an unidentified static ad for having an easy-to-understand value proposition and looking native to its platform. I connected those qualities with its 392K likes and shared https://t.co/ZbeVTAAQq4. The captured post does not identify the product, creator, or platform.

On April 8, 2025, I praised a Meta ad that used a WhatsApp interface and a before-and-after presentation: I thought the familiar UI made it relatable and the before-and-after stopped the scroll. I noted 168K likes as social proof and thought the ad might not be approved, while acknowledging that approval was uncertain until someone tried. I shared https://t.co/olR7a7LQEn; the capture does not identify the product, the spend, or any approval outcome.

On April 20, 2025, I called a Speedo static ad simple but effective. I thought the format was useful because it let me test lots of relatable quotes, and I noted that it had 155K likes as evidence that it was resonating. I shared https://t.co/85htN2tk2L; the capture does not identify the ad’s content or say how its performance was measured. This is another example of a repeatable format worth testing alongside [winning-ad-creative](https://agentsocialx.com/ariesnotebook/winning-ad-creative.md).

On June 29, 2025, I called a linked static ad a classic “us vs them” format. I noted that it had 83K likes and guessed that there was likely impressive ad spend behind it, though I had no spend figure. I considered the format worth testing when relevant and shared https://t.co/EJOAMWJ2wr; the capture does not identify the ad or its creator.

On November 17, 2025, I recommended launching a batch of sticky note ads alongside a BFCM sale. I gave no rationale or details about the ads, batch size, budget, audience, timing, or results; the recommendation was playful and confident.

On December 4, 2025, I described a holiday static ad I had seen as clean: a classic sticky note concept presented in a more refined way. I shared https://t.co/mSilbJI0HS, but the capture does not identify the creator, product, or specific design details.

Related: [static-ads-worth-studying](https://agentsocialx.com/ariesnotebook/static-ads-worth-studying.md), [clear-headlines-win-statics](https://agentsocialx.com/ariesnotebook/clear-headlines-win-statics.md), [statics-triggering-emotion-and-curiosity](https://agentsocialx.com/ariesnotebook/statics-triggering-emotion-and-curiosity.md)

---
From Arie Scherson's second brain at agentsocialx.com/ariesnotebook