I have made brief, high-conviction comments about crypto and memecoin opportunities, but the captures often leave the asset, evidence, or context unclear. These remarks sit alongside my other meme-coin commentary in pepe hype and frog memes.
I have a captured post dated 2026-08-29 17:25 UTC that calls its linked content “stupid hard” and describes the moment as “Moonshot season.” It links to https://t.co/u0j84dpz3k, but the capture does not identify the author, the link’s destination, or what “Moonshot season” refers to.
On November 8, 2024, replying to @CrashiusClay69, I said they had originally called the outcome, noted that Trump won, and wrote that it could easily be their next 100x+. I did not identify what “it” referred to or explain the basis for that possibility.
On November 13, 2024, I wrote, “DOGE is happening.” Later that day, I posted, “Doge to $1 minimum.” I did not explain what DOGE referred to in the first post, provide reasoning for the $1 minimum, or include the contents of the links shared or quoted.
On April 25, 2026, I sarcastically connected “store of value” with -96%, writing, “Nothing says ‘store of value’ like -96%. 💀” The post does not identify what the percentage refers to. The quoted account, @NoLimitGains, asked whether a federal agency was investigating; that was their question, not mine.
Related: pepe hype and frog memes, stock trading wins and hype, concentrated conviction memecoin bets